<?xml version="1.0"?>

<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     >

  <channel>
    <title>WyBlog</title>
    <link>http://wyblog.us/blog</link>
    <atom:link href="http://wyblog.us/blog/index.rss20" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>The WyBlog, live and in color.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Copyright (c) 2012 Christopher H. Wysocki</copyright>

    

    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:50:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>

    <item>
      <title>Komen capitulates, caves to the Abortion-Industrial Complex</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/feminists/komen-capitulates.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
That didn't take long. The Susan G. Komen Foundation 
<a href="http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/02/03/breaking-komen-foundation-capitulates-renews-funding-for-planned-parenthood/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Tatler">
caved</a> to the merchants of death.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood,
and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants.
</p>

<p>
Yes, those little pink ribbons still do signify the blood of innocents.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Komen" rel="tag">Komen</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Planned-Parenthood" rel="tag">Planned-Parenthood</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/abortion" rel="tag">abortion</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/feminists</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">komen-capitulates</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Just when you thought the presidential election follies couldn&#39;t get any weirder</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/roseanne-barr-running-for-president.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
<p>
<a href="http://iconicphotos.wordpress.com/2010/05/16/roseanne-barr/">
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/roseanne-barr-crotch-grab.jpg" class="iright" /></a>
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/roseanne-barr-seeks-green-party-presidential-nod-234829062.html">
Roseanne Barr is running for president!</a> And unlike Stephen Colbert, she's
<em>serious</em>. Well, as serious as someone who grabs her crotch and spits
whenever she sings the National Anthem can be. But that's serious enough for
the Green Party!
</p>

<p class="quoted">
The actress-comedian said in a statement that she's a longtime supporter of 
the party and looks forward to working with people who share her values. She 
said the two major parties aren't serving the American people.
</p>

<p>
She's got a pretty interesting economic recovery plan too. 
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2044747/Roseanne-Barrs-solution-banking-crisis-Bring-guillotine.html">
<em>Beheadings!</em></a>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
'I do say that I am in favour of the return of the guillotine and that is for 
the worst of the worst of the guilty.
</p>
<p>
'I first would allow the guilty bankers to pay, you know, the ability to pay 
back anything over $100 million [of] personal wealth because I believe in a 
maximum wage of $100 million.
</p>
<p>
'And if they are unable to live on that amount of that amount then they should, 
you know, go to the re-education camps and if that doesn't help, then being 
beheaded.'
</p>
</div>

<p>
Re-education camps? Guillotines? What happened to everybody sit in a circle
and sing kumbaya? Does Dick Cheney know you're in favor of this stuff? I'm
sure he'll be glad to give you a few pointers.
</p>

<p>
Barr plans to bring her message of economic justice and 
<a href="http://www.roseanneworld.com/blog/2010/10/brilliant-analysis-jon-gold.php">
9/11 Truth</a> to America's livingrooms.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
"I will barnstorm American living rooms," she said in a candidate questionnaire 
submitted to the Green Party. "Mainstream media will be unable to ignore me, 
but more importantly they will be unable to overlook the needs of average 
Americans in the run-up to the 2012 election."
</p>

<p>
Bolt your doors, or she'll barnstorm your living room. Probably track all
kinds of stuff in too, and leave it on your carpet. She's been hanging out
with the Occupods you know. But not, alas, hosting any "average Americans" 
on her 46 acre Hawaiian macadamia nut farm. 
</p>

<p>
Because in her case, the nut didn't fall very far from the tree.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/election" rel="tag">election</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Roseanne-Barr" rel="tag">Roseanne-Barr</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Green-Party" rel="tag">Green-Party</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/election</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">roseanne-barr-running-for-president</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Thursday Theodicies, Mirror, mirror on the wall, who&#39;s the greatest POTUS of all?</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/misc/thursday-theodicies-02-02-12.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
OK, so we had meatloaf for dinner tonight. My favorite. And our neighbor came
by to dine with us. I may have had a glass of Scotch. Or two.
</p>

<p>
So I'm ready to <em>opine</em>. 
</p>

<p>
Who would Jesus tax? Obama has the answer &mdash; 
<a href="http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-at-prayer-breakfast-jesus-would-tax-the-rich/">
us!</a>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
President Barack Obama said Thursday his proposal to raise taxes on wealthy 
Americans is in accordance with the teachings of Jesus Christ.
</p>
<p>
"But for me as a Christian, it also coincides with Jesus' teaching that, 'for 
unto whom much is given, much shall be required,'" he said.
</p>
</div>

<p>
I hope the folks at the prayer breakfast had something stronger than coffee
in their cups. And that it didn't come shooting out of their noses when he
spoke.
</p>

<p>
Christian values and Obama? Yeah, I know what you're thinking. I'm thinking
it too. But wait, 
<a href="http://patdollard.com/2012/02/obama-i-pushed-dodd-frank-and-health-care-reform-because-of-christ/">
it gets better</a>.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
The president said he often falls to his knees in prayer.
</p>

<p>
Of course he does. Every time he sees a mirror.
</p>

<p>
So of late these daily alliterative aggregations haven't been multi-faceted.
I get on a roll, and well, you know how it is. The post takes on a life of its
own. Maybe my meds finally kicked in?
</p>

<p>
Nah, that can't be it. I'm as ADD as they come. And I like bouncing topics.
On <em>trampolines</em>. I definitely like to watch <em>topics</em> bounce
on trampolines. Big <em>topics</em>. Loosely aggregated.
</p>

<p>
Oh yeah&hellip; Wait, where was I?
</p>

<p>
<a href="http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/chevy-volts-selling-like-hot-cakes/">
Chevy Volts are selling like hot cakes</a>. Three day old, stale, roach-infested
hot cakes, next to a free gourmet buffet. But hot cakes none the less. And 
Government Motors is committed to them! 
</p>

<p>
Is Government Motors committed to <em>profits?</em> Not that I can tell.
</p>

<p>
From Frank J's latest 
<a href="http://www.imao.us/index.php/2012/02/random-thoughts-644/">
Random Thoughts</a>.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
I could be an enthusiastic Romney supporter. The Romney campaign just needs 
to tell me where to send the invoice for that.
</p>

<p>
Me too Frank. Me too.
</p>

<p>
I work cheap!
</p>

<p>
Out with the new, in with the old. Or if you prefer, 
<a href="http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2012/02/taliban-ready-to-seize-power-in.html">
they're <em>baaaaaack!</em></a>
</p>

<p class="quoted">
The Taliban is set to return to power in Afghanistan when British and Coalition 
forces end their combat role in 2014, a damning leaked confidential report reveals.
</p>

<p>
Biding their time, they were. Just waiting for a political hack like Leon
Panetta to get all squishy and pull the plug on Operation Enduring Freedom.
</p>

<p>
Obama's making sure our freedoms don't endure here at home. Why on earth
would he want to support freedom for the people of Afghanistan? 
</p>

<p>
Mister we could use a man like Donald Rumsfeld again.
</p>

<p>
Finally, and because I'm tired, I have one simple question. Which one of you
knuckleheads knocked me off the 
<a href="http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2012/01/top-150-conservative-websites-1q12.html">
Top 150 Conservative Blogs</a> list? Was it <a href="http://thecampofthesaints.org/">
Belvedere?</a> That <strike>snake</strike> bloggeriffic genius, always with
the Rule 5. He snuck in at #147. And <em>Blam!</em> I'm pixels in the ether,
forgotten like another one of Obama's campaign promises.
</p>

<p>
Fame is fleeting. And alas, addictive. I'm gonna have to ask Tori for a little
help. You know, just to get me back into the game.
</p>

<p class="indent">
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/rule5/tori-chair-01a.jpg" />

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obama" rel="tag">Obama</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/prayer" rel="tag">prayer</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Chevy-Volt" rel="tag">Chevy-Volt</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Mitt-Romney" rel="tag">Mitt-Romney</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/misc</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">thursday-theodicies-02-02-12</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Essex County again funnels taxpayer dollars to Planned Parenthood&#39;s infanticide mill</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/feminists/essex-co-10-grand-pp-grant.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
The merchants of death always find a way to suckle at the public teat even
though Chris Christie repeatedly vetoes the Democrats' attempts to fund them 
directly. One trick is to have no-scruples local politicians misuse the federal 
Community Development Block Grant program to pay the butcher's bill.
</p>

<p>
And so, again this year 
<a href="http://thejerseytomatopress.com/stories/Grant-for-Planned-Parenthood-from-Community-Development-Block-Grant,9183">
Essex County Executive Joe DiVincenzo arranged a $10,000 "donation"</a> on behalf
of county taxpayers to the baby killers of Planned Parenthood. It comes from
$4.9 million of CDBG funds earmarked for the Emergency Shelter Grant Program.
</p>

<p>
Our tax dollars at work. "Sheltering" abortionists. Because they need
"emergency" funding. Or something.
</p>

<p>
It's a disgrace. Sadly our all-Democrat, rubber-stamp Freeholder board won't
even bat an eye. And, because the citizens of this county are genetically
incapable of voting for politicians with integrity, there ain't a damned
thing I can do about it.
</p>

<p>
How many abortions will $10,000 buy? One is too many. Not that anyone around
town besides me seems to care. The Giants are in the Super Bowl! Apparently
that's more important.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Planned-Parenthood" rel="tag">Planned-Parenthood</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Essex-County" rel="tag">Essex-County</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/CDBG" rel="tag">CDBG</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Joe-DiVincenzo" rel="tag">Joe-DiVincenzo</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/abortion" rel="tag">abortion</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/feminists</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">essex-co-10-grand-pp-grant</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Chris Christie stands up for his bizarre NJ Supreme Court nominees</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/christie-stands-behind-njsc-nominees.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
I told you guys 
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/christie-judicial-diversity-no-exp-req.html">
the fix was in</a>. And I was right!
</p>

<p>
Bruce Harris, the first openly gay man nominated for a seat on New Jersey's
State Supreme Court, does in fact have a published opinion on the key hot
button issue of the day. Gay "marriage." He's <em>for</em> it.
</p>

<p>
In 2009 Harris 
<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/289660/kind-judge-president-christie-would-nominate-maggie-gallagher">
wrote a letter</a> to State Senator Joe Pennacchio equating our Judeo-Christian 
marriage traditions with <em>slavery</em>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
When I hear someone say that they believe marriage is only between a man and a 
woman because that's the way it's always been, I think of the many "traditions"
that deprived people of their civil rights for centuries: prohibitions on 
interracial marriage, slavery, (which is even provided for in the Bible), 
segregation, the subservience of women, to name just a few of these "traditions."
</p>
<p>
I hope that you consider my request that you re-evaluate your position and, if 
after viewing the videos, reading Governor Whitman's letter and thinking again 
about this issue of civil rights you still oppose same-sex marriage on grounds 
other than religion I would appreciate it if you'd explain your position to me. 
And, if the basis of your opposition is religious, then I suggest that you do 
what the US Constitution mandates &mdash; and that is to maintain a separation 
between the state and religion.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Any guess on how Bruce Harris will rule when gay "marriage" hits the docket?
</p>

<p>
Oh, but it's OK! Harris promises to recuse himself from that one court case. 
BFD. He's got no concept of Original Intent and he's perfectly willing to 
invent new "rights" by judicial fiat. He's an activist, nominated to a court
noted for it's activism. More importantly, Chris Christie promised he'd put
a leash on our activist judiciary and this nomination turns that promise on
its head.
</p>

<p>
Not that Christie's willing to admit he screwed up. Oh no. 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/02/pressured_by_dems_gov_christie.html">
He's digging in for a fight</a>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
Buffeted by questions from Senate Democrats about the qualifications of his two 
state Supreme Court nominees, Gov. Chris Christie Wednesday ramped up a campaign
to trumpet their achievements and called for swift hearings.
</p>
<p>
Christie rolled out several endorsements from politicians and former colleagues 
of the nominees, Bruce Harris, 61, a private attorney and mayor of Chatham 
borough, and Phillip Kwon, 44, first assistant state attorney general and a 
former federal prosecutor.
</p>
</div>

<p>
State Senator Kevin O'Toole, who's usually a pretty level headed guy, is giddy
as a schoolgirl at the prospect of the first Asian-American sitting on New
Jersey's highest court. 
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
Last night in Hackensack, a handful of Korean community leaders joined state 
Sen. Kevin O'Toole (R-Essex) to rally in support Kwon, who would be the high 
court's first Asian-American justice.
</p>
<p>
"What I'm a little disheartened to see is there are a number of state senators 
who have rushed to judge, or I should say prejudge," O'Toole said.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Qualifications be damned, Identity Politics <i>Rulez!</i>
</p>

<p>
O'Toole's not alone, Assembly Republicans 
<a href="http://www.njassemblyrepublicans.com/?p=2205">
put their blinders on</a> to fall in line behind Christie too.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
"Politics should not interfere in the nomination process of two exemplary 
candidates. Their academic records, in conjunction with their experience in 
the law, are outstanding."
</p>

<p>
See? Pointing out the nominees' obvious flaws is <em>politics</em>. They did
great in college! They're experienced lawyers! What's not to like?
</p>

<p>
Any resemblance between NJ Republicans and Actual Conservatives is purely
in your imagination. These guys put the "O" in RINO. As in "O" No, here they
go again.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NJ-Politics" rel="tag">NJ-Politics</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Chris-Christie" rel="tag">Chris-Christie</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Bruce-Harris" rel="tag">Bruce-Harris</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Phillip-Kwon" rel="tag">Phillip-Kwon</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/gay-marriage" rel="tag">gay-marriage</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/nj_politics</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">christie-stands-behind-njsc-nominees</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Wednesday Waterloo, the Feminist Freakout edition</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/feminists/wednesday-waterloo-02-01-12.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
When feminist shibboleths collide, it ain't pretty.
</p>

<p>
In one corner we have <em>breast cancer</em>, the deadly disease dreaded by
all women, personified by pink ribbons worn in support of the Susan G. Komen
Foundation.
</p>

<p>
In the other corner we have infanticide, the vaunted "right to choose" our 
Supreme Court found emanating from penumbras, practiced with ruthless 
efficiency by Planned Parenthood.
</p>

<p>
In the middle are modern feminists, supporters of Susan G. Komen, who in turn
funds the Kermit Gosnells employed by Planned Parenthood.
</p>

<p>
Er, make that <em>funded</em>. Past tense. Because the Komen Foundation woke 
up one day and realized that an organization which saves womens' lives ought 
not be in the business of subsidizing one that's dedicated to murdering baby 
girls.
</p>

<p>
Bravo for them. If only the Girl Scouts could exhibit the same clarity of
thought.
</p>

<p>
But among feminists there is much wailing and gnashing of teeth. They're 
aghast at Komen for "betraying" the Ya-Ya sisterhood. Death by cancer, 
<em>bad</em>. But infanticide by saline injection, when you've got Important 
Things you still haven't done yet? <em>Choice!</em>  
</p>

<p>
Alas, "Save us from dying of breast cancer so we can kill our unborn children" 
does not strike me as a winning slogan. But apparently it's all they've got.
</p>

<p>
Let's go for some moral clarity. 
<a href="http://www.thejerseytomatopress.com/stories/How-a-Charity-Built-its-Success-on-the-chests-of-Sick-Women-and-Stabbed-them-in-the-Back,9181">
Here's local newswoman Diane Lilly:</a>
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Do I think abortions are wonderful? Of course I don't. Do I want them to be 
legal? Yes, I do, because if they are not legal, many many young girls and 
women will die from botched abortions.
</p>

<p>
Got that? Abortions aren't <em>wonderful</em>, they're just <em>necessary!</em>
Or young girls and women will die! <em>Many many</em> of them!
</p>

<p>
How many? 57 million? 
</p>

<p>
Not hardly. But remember that number. I'll say it again. <em>Fifty Seven
Million</em>. That's how many babies have died at the hands of abortionists
like Planned Parenthood since January 1973.
</p>

<p>
Six million Jews died. That was a Holocaust. Fifty Seven Million dead babies?
They're a <em>statistic</em>. No one weeps for them. There are no museums on 
the National Mall dedicated to their suffering. Instead of "never again," it's
abort as often as you'd like.
</p>

<p>
Michael Vick killed a <em>dog</em>. He's Public Enemy #1.
</p>

<p>
Planned Parenthood kills babies by the truckload. They're heroes. To feminists
anyway. Because puppies are cute and a fetus is just a clump of cells.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Women and young girls everywhere must stand up and say no to political stands 
taken by a non-profit organization that is supposed to support women.
</p>

<p>
"Support women?" Which women? The shrill, vociferous ones? Or the helpless
unborn who can't speak for themselves? 
</p>

<p>
That's a question feminists don't want to answer.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/feminists" rel="tag">feminists</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/abortion" rel="tag">abortion</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Planned-Parenthood" rel="tag">Planned-Parenthood</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Susan-G-Komen" rel="tag">Susan-G-Komen</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/feminists</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">wednesday-waterloo-02-01-12</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Vote for Obama, and he&#39;ll pay your mortgage!</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/obama_watch/obama-will-pay-your-mortgage.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Well, part of it anyway. That's the latest 
<a href="http://www.jammiewf.com/2012/obama-to-unveil-new-vote-buying-scheme/">
vote-buying scheme</a> Barry's unveiling today &mdash; force banks to accept 
write-downs on underwater mortgages, and then refinance the balance at 
"historically low" interest rates.
</p>

<p>
Even the <i>Star-Ledger</i> can't mask 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/02/president_obama_to_outline_det.html">
the obvious <i>quid pro quo</i></a> going on here.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
The Obama administration is trying to fix a stubborn drag on the economy by 
allowing millions of more homeowners to refinance their mortgages at lower 
interest rates even if they owe more than their homes are worth, tackling a 
difficult issue of vital concern in states key to President Barack Obama's 
re-election.
</p>

<p>
Heh, <em>vital concern to Obama's re-election</em> indeed. It's the whole
point of the exercise. Buy votes with a new tax on the banks!
</p>

<p class="quoted">
The administration proposal faces a major hurdle in Congress. The program would 
cost between $5 billion and $10 billion, depending on participation, and would 
be paid for by a fee on large banks. The administration has tried unsuccessfully 
before to win support for such a tax on large banks.
</p>

<p>
So first he gave the banks free money (TARP) and now he's gonna whack them good
and hard because he needs votes more than he needs their campaign contributions.
</p>

<p>
The best part (for him) is he gets to paint Republicans as heartless Scrooges
simply because we'll insist people honor their commitments and pay their
bills. 
</p>

<p>
Fortunately this nonsense has very little chance of passing the House. And
maybe the GOP presidential contenders could take a moment to remind folks that
their mortgages wouldn't be underwater in the first place if Obama had actually 
<em>fixed the economy</em> like he said he would. Everything he's done so far
has made things worse. <em>Everything</em>. Don't forget that come November.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obama" rel="tag">Obama</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/housing" rel="tag">housing</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/mortgage" rel="tag">mortgage</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/HAMP" rel="tag">HAMP</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/obama_watch</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">obama-will-pay-your-mortgage</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Tunicated Tuesday Turmoil, from Florida flows flagitious flummery</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/tunicated-tuesday-turmoil-01-31-12.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Does anyone care which primary is next after Florida? I'm sure there is one.
But I have GOP candidate fatigue and can't bear to look it up.
</p>

<p>
Every time I open Facebook now I'm bombarded by zealots. <em>Ron Paul!</em>,
or you're not a Real Conservative! No, <em>Rick Santorum!</em>, because Ron Paul
is a <em>Raaaaacist!</em> Wait, <em>Newt!</em>, because Sarah Palin loves him 
and Mitt hates puppies! No, <em>Mitt</em> is our man because&hellip;, well just 
<em>because</em>, that's why. And Newt really invented Obamacare anyway.
</p>

<p>
I think I liked FB better when everyone was just nagging me to play Farmville.
</p>

<p>
Smitty calls for a 
<a href="http://theothermccain.com/2012/01/31/can-somebody-explain-this/">
truce</a>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
I can't figure out what the devil is going wrong with the conservative 
blogosphere. The candidates all suck: get over it. There are a lot of 
unreasonable ways that people could be spreading hasty propaganda in an 
effort to skew results.
</p>
<p>
Don't be hasty! Even if the intent is not evil, crapflooding has evil results. 
We expect that from the Left. Have your preferred candidates, but understand 
that, post-convention, we still have to coalesce as a team.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Then again, his blogging partner seems to be 
<a href="http://theothermccain.com/2012/01/31/congratulations-perry-supporters/">
blaming Perry supporters</a> for Santorum's anemic poll numbers.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Just ask yourselves, Perrybots, what might have been possible if some other 
candidate &mdash; <em>any</em> other candidate, perhaps one who could remember 
how to count to three &mdash; had an extra $20 million to spend here in Florida. 
But no, you spent months telling the rest of us that Rick Perry was The Only 
Conservative Who Could Beat Romney, an argument you didn't hesitate to repeat 
as late as December, long after it was apparent that he wasn't ready for prime 
time. And you still refuse to admit that you were misled, and helped mislead 
others, into jumping aboard that hopeless Bandwagon to Loserville. 
</p>

<p>
Hey, Stacy McCain is a kick-ass gonzo journalist and all. He Knows Things. I'm 
just a random Polack from New Jersey. But it occurs to me that Rick Perry, 
a guy who's actually won elections and governed from conservative principles,
might have gotten more traction if a certain gonzo journalist hadn't taken a 
flyer on the likes of Herman Cain, and in the process <em>misled</em> a whole 
lotta other folks into buying a one-way ticket on the 9-9-9 Restraining Order 
Express. Cain wanted to be president alright, just not President of the United
States. More like president of Hooters, if you get my drift. Certainly beats 
that web site idea, right?
</p>

<p>
Anyway, what's done is done, and we're left to pick up the pieces, and maybe
remember that we're all here to do one thing, and one thing only. <em>Defeat
Obama</em>. Oh, and retain control of the House. And maybe pick up a Senate
majority too. A pretty tall order on a good day. 
</p>

<p>
Alas, today is not a good day. Today is Florida primary day. And no matter
who wins tonight the long knives are going to grow longer. The True Believers
are dug in for the long haul now, and whatever bloody corpse emerges from
Tampa as our nominee will most certaily find a rejuvenated Obama ready to
regurgitate every negative ad and soundbite ever uttered by those he left
behind.
</p>

<p>
Is that what we really want?

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Florida" rel="tag">Florida</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Mitt-Romney" rel="tag">Mitt-Romney</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Newt-Gingrich" rel="tag">Newt-Gingrich</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Rick-Santorum" rel="tag">Rick-Santorum</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Ron-Paul" rel="tag">Ron-Paul</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/election</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tunicated-tuesday-turmoil-01-31-12</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Listen numbnuts, don&#39;t mess with Chris Christie</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/reed-gusciora-numbnuts.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
When Chris Christie is on his game he is <em>On His Game</em>.
</p>

<p>
And when a back-bencher state Assemblyman crosses a line, he gets swatted
like a bug.
</p>

<p>
Responding to Christie's call for a statewide referendum on gay "marriage"
Assemblyman Reed Gusciora (D-Mercer) said:
</p>

<p class="quoted">
"Govs. Lester Maddox and George Wallace would have found allies in Chris 
Christie over efforts by the Justice Department to end segregation in the 
South."
</p>

<p>
The race card. What a surprise. With the Democrats it's <em>always</em> 
the race card.
</p>

<p>
But Christie was having none of it. 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/01/gov_christie_clarifies_his_rem.html">
Watch the video</a>.
</p>

<div class="indent">
<object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=1423679057001&playerID=651974715001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAPLMIP6E~,BRrRHTAljlF40NofMDxsColEK-8KEsxy&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=1423679057001&playerID=651974715001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAPLMIP6E~,BRrRHTAljlF40NofMDxsColEK-8KEsxy&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object>
</div>

<p>
And the money quote:
</p>

<p class="quoted">
You have numbnuts like Reed Gusciora who put out a statement comparing me to
George Wallace and Lester Maddox. Now you know, c'mon guys, at some point 
you've got be able to call BS on those kind of press releases.
</p>

<p>
The media is calling BS alright, on <em>Christie</em>, because <em>he</em> 
dared to call an openly gay Assemblyman "numbnuts." The <i>Star-Ledger</i> is 
aghast. Apparently it's a <em>slur</em>. 
</p>

<p>
As if. It's a Jersey thing. Everybody says it. <i>(Although after laughing 
perhaps a little too raucously I did have to come up with an explanation for 
the term "numbnuts" suitable for a ten year old. You just know she's gonna use 
the word in school tomorrow. Cue the phone call from the Principal in 3... 2... 
1...)</i>
</p>

<p>
Nothing will stop the perpetually aggrieved from being, well, 
<em>aggrieved</em> though. After all, it's what they do. 
</p>

<p>
Here's Christie again:
</p>

<p class="quoted">
There are any number of you in this room who may have a quarrel with my politics.
George Wallace and Lester Maddox? You know, I don't think they were advocating
for urban education. I think we've got a pretty good distinction there. And I
think that those who say things like that like Assemblyman Gusciora should be
ashamed of themselves. That they're that desperate to try to change the topic
on this issue that they would actually raise those folks, reprehensible people
in America's history.
</p>

<p>
Well yeah. <i>Raaaaacism!</i> is the last desperate cry of those who have no
cogent argument. It's an empty epithet now. Devoid of force. A caricature of
battles long since past, and won.
</p>

<p>
So here's the thing <em>numbnuts</em>. When you're thinking we don't like you 
because you're Black or Gay (or <em>whatever</em>&hellip;) consider this. Maybe 
we don't like you because you're an <em>asshole</em>. 
</p>

<p>
Yeah, really.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Chris-Christie" rel="tag">Chris-Christie</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Reed-Gusciora" rel="tag">Reed-Gusciora</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/gay-marriage" rel="tag">gay-marriage</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/nj_politics</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">reed-gusciora-numbnuts</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Donald Trump wants a fairway to heaven</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/odds_n_ends/fairway-to-heaven.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
When it comes to your country club membership, Donald Trump says you <em>can</em>
take it with you. Or rather, you can be laid into eternal rest alongside the
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/01/donald_trump_death_burial.html">
Trump National Fairway to Heaven</a>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
The colorful real estate mogul will soon seek the blessing of a state board to 
build a private cemetery beside the rolling hills and silken greens of his 
prized Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster.
</p>
<p>
The 1.5-acre site would become the exclusive final resting place for wealthy 
club members who pay as much as $300,000 in membership fees. And a section of 
the lush plot would be carved out for Trump and his next of kin, said Ed Russo, 
a Trump consultant.
</p>
</div>

<p>
You can count on a hole in one at the end of your final round.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Donald-Trump" rel="tag">Donald-Trump</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/golf" rel="tag">golf</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/odds_n_ends</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">fairway-to-heaven</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Heretical Gospel According to Pope Barack Hussein Obama The First</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/religion/pope-barack-hussein-the-first.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Via 
<a href="http://www.punditandpundette.com/2012/01/audacity-of-despair.html">
Pundette</a> comes the latest Obamacare tyranny &mdash; 
<a href="http://blog.cardinalnewmansociety.org/2012/01/26/fr-rutler-what-happens-when-a-government-tries-to-chain-the-conscience/">
Pope Barack Hussein Obama The First overrules 20 centuries of Catholic
doctrine</a>.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Undeterred, and menacingly on the cusp of the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the 
Department of Health and Human Services has issued an "interim final rule" 
which requires all private health plans, including those of Catholic hospitals 
and schools, to include coverage of prescription contraceptives, female 
sterilization procedures, and abortion counseling.
</p>

<p>
Thereby replacing <i>"Thou Shalt Not Kill"</i> with a new heresy &mdash;
The Gospel According to Obama.
</p>

<p>
<a href="http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-admin-mandates-religious-employers-cover-contraception-cost-catholic-bishops-furious/">
Archbishop Timothy Dolan:</a>
</p>

<p class="quoted">
"Never before has the federal government forced individuals and organizations 
to go out into the marketplace and buy a product that violates their 
conscience," said Dolan. "This shouldn't happen in a land where free exercise 
of religion ranks first in the Bill of Rights."
</p>

<p>
Disobey our consciences and our faith, or disengage completely from providing 
health care services. He's "graciously" given us a year to decide. Archbishop
Dolan again:
</p>

<p class="quoted">
"In effect, the president is saying we have a year to figure out how to 
violate our consciences."
</p>

<p>
Which is of course no time at all. Except there's an election coming up.
No Catholic can in good conscience vote for Barack Obama. Not after this.
To re-elect Obama is to put him above God, to disavow a core tenet of our
Catholic faith, to turn your back on everything that Christ taught. 
</p>

<p>
And to be complicit in mortal sin. We still believe in mortal sin, don't we? Us
Catholics, I mean. The secular world has long since decided to look the other
way. Can we? Can we turn our backs and accede to government-sanctioned
infanticide? Will we pay our blood money and call it "health care?"
</p>

<p>
I hope not. 
</p>

<p>
Is it hyperbole to posit that Barack Hussein Obama is the Antichrist?
He will destroy Holy Mother Church. He has said as much, and his actions
cannot possibly be interpreted differently. The Church is already out of the
adoption business, forced by Obama to surrender our doctrinal authority to 
the vagaries of homosexual dystopianism.
</p>

<p>
Now he'll prevent us from providing health care. No Catholic hospital can
operate under this requirement. They'll be sold, at fire sale prices, probably
to Obama cronies like George Soros and Warren Buffett. And no Catholic school
will be able to offer health insurance to their employees. "Look at the
heartless Catholics," his sycophantic media will say. "The public schools
give their employees the best health insurance available!"
</p>

<p>
He will not stop until the Catholic Church is scrubbed from the public
square. Banished, like lepers, to the fringes of Obama's New World Order.
Crushed under the secular jackboot labeled "tolerance."
</p>

<p>
And then what is left? Who will the people turn to? <em>Government!</em>
</p>

<p>
His message is seductively simple, a siren song, music to the ears of a
fickle and easily distracted populace. <i>Obama is our shepherd, we shall 
not want</i>. It is the eternal seduction of the evil one, played out in
the United States of America in the Year of Our Lord 2012.
</p>

<p>
In November Barack Obama <em>must</em> be defeated. Or he will destroy us.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obamacare" rel="tag">Obamacare</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/abortion" rel="tag">abortion</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/birth-control" rel="tag">birth-control</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Catholic" rel="tag">Catholic</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/religion</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">pope-barack-hussein-the-first</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Obamanomics Sets New Records edition</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk25.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
In case you're keeping score at home, 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/01/nj_gas_prices_rise_again.html">
the price of gas went up by another 3 cents last week</a>. And Obama's EPA 
<a href="http://www.westernjournalism.com/firstenergy-to-close-six-coal-fired-plants-due-to-epa-regulations/">
shuttered 6 more power plants</a> in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Maryland.
</p>

<p>
Hey, what's another 529 Americans put out of work by Lisa Jackson's 
eco-fascists, right?
</p>

<p>
Mother Gaia is pleased as punch! Our wallets? No so much.
</p>

<p>
Meanwhile the green energy boondoggle continues to waste taxpayer dollars at
a record clip. Yup, yet another recipient of DOE subsidies has gone 
<a href="http://www.westernjournalism.com/firstenergy-to-close-six-coal-fired-plants-due-to-epa-regulations/">
bankrupt</a>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
An Indiana-based energy-storage company, whose subsidiary received a $118.5 
million stimulus grant from the Energy Department, filed for bankruptcy Thursday.
</p>
<p>
Ener1 is asking a federal bankruptcy court in New York to approve a plan to 
restructure the company's debt and infuse $81 million in equity funding.
</p>
<p>
The Energy Department in 2009 approved a $118.5 million stimulus grant for 
EnerDel, a subsidiary of the company that develops lithium-ion batteries used 
in electric vehicles. The company has so far spent $55 million of the federal 
funding.
</p>
</div>

<p>
I'm sure it's just a coincidence that all these taxpayer "investments" wind
up circling the drain. You know, if Dick Cheney had spent half this much
money on something useful that was made by Halliburton the lamentations
would still be reverberating across the front page of <i>The New York Times</i>.
</p>

<p>
But Barry's misguided attempts to prop up unproven pie-in-the-sky foolishness
always gets a pass.
</p>

<p>
Now people keep telling me that Obama "inherited" an economic crisis. Perhaps
he did. But it's been <em>three years</em> since he promised to fix things,
and every single action he's taken has made the problem <em>worse</em>.
</p>

<p>
Earlier this week, after Barry gave his State Of The Re-election speech, 
Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels summed up the Obamanomics record in one 
<a href="http://blog.american.com/2012/01/romneys-economic-case-against-obama-all-in-one-chart/">
utterly damning chart</a>.
</p>

<p>
<a href="http://blog.american.com/2012/01/romneys-economic-case-against-obama-all-in-one-chart/">
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/runningbehind.jpg" /></a>
</p>

<p>
The Wall Street Journal 
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203363504577185313667095068.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">
sums up</a> Barry's inability to inspire economic confidence.
</p>

<p class="indent">
Many business leaders say they are also being held back by policy-related 
uncertainty, everything from the threat of new regulations and higher taxes to 
the fear that political gridlock could hamper the government's ability to 
respond to a new crisis. Recent economic research has given some weight to 
those complaints. A study by a trio of academic economists found that policy 
uncertainty has risen in recent years, and that periods of uncertainty have in 
the past corresponded with rising unemployment and slowing growth.
</p>

<p>
Contrast Barry's sub-3% GDP growth numbers with the Reagan boom.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
The first nine quarters of the Reagan Recovery, by contrast, looked like this:  
5.1 percent, 9.3 percent, 8.1 percent, 8.5 percent, 8.0 percent, 7.1 percent, 
3.9 percent, 3.3 percent, 3.8, percent, 3.4 percent. In fact, the Reagan Boom 
went from the first quarter of 1983 until the second quarter of 1986 without 
notching a sub-3 percent GDP quarter.
</p>

<p>
The only economic statistic Barry's keeping above 8% is the unemployment rate.
You'll recall that Porkulus was <em>guaranteed</em> to keep it under 8%. Paul
Krugman said so! 
</p>

<p>
So of course when last year's GDP came in at 
<a href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/01/gdp-shrinks-in-2011-to-pathetic-1-7-bushs-fault/">
an anemic 1.7%</a> it must somehow still be George Bush's fault. Because Obama
killed Bin Laden! So he's obviously the better president.
</p>

<p>
You know what else must not be Barry's fault? New home sales for 2011 were 
<a href="http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/thanks-barack-december-new-home-sales-worst-on-record/">
the worst on record</a>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
The Commerce Department says new-home sales fell last month to a seasonally 
adjusted annual pace of 307,000. The pace is less than half the 700,000 that 
economists say must be sold in a healthy economy.
</p>
<p>
Total sales last year were less than the 323,000 sold in 2010, making it the 
worst year on records dating back to 1963.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Liberal media spin? Obama Recovery Sets New Records!
</p>

<p>
Well, <em>sure</em>.
</p>

<p>
<br clear="all" />
-----------<br />
Previously:<br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk24.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Pipeline Dreams Busted By Green Schemes edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk23.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Downgrade Fever is Catchy edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk22.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Short Term Gain For Long Term Pain edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk21.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Year End Wrapup Unhappy New Year Edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk19.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Debbie Wasserman Schultz Reality Check edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk18.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report: the Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk17.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Incredibly Shrinking Labor Force edition</a>

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obama" rel="tag">Obama</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/jobs" rel="tag">jobs</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/unemployment" rel="tag">unemployment</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/GDP" rel="tag">GDP</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/housing" rel="tag">housing</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/green-energy" rel="tag">green-energy</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/economy</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">obama-jobs-report-wk25</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Friday Fratricide, the GOP Debate Circular Firing Squad edition</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/friday-fratricide-01-27-12.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
I sure hope the Obama campaign pays Wolf Blitzer a bonus. His performance on
their behalf last night was well orchestrated and brilliantly executed. He 
walked those four jimokes down the garden path and they turned on each other
like rabid dogs.
</p>

<p>
Best line from the night? <i>"I'm Mitt Romney and I approve this message that
I haven't actually seen."</i> Sheesh, what a putz.
</p>

<p>
Pundette has 
<a href="http://www.punditandpundette.com/2012/01/newt-fatigue.html">
Newt fatigue</a>. I imagine there's going to be a lot of that going around,
<a href="http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/01/pre-debate-irreparable-split/">
egged on by the GOP Establishment</a>.
</p>

<p>
Stacy McCain says 
<a href="http://theothermccain.com/2012/01/26/cnn-jacksonville-florida-debate/">
Santorum "kicked butt."</a> I'm not so sure. He comes across to me as angry, 
petty, and mean-spirited. Plus there's that whole "lost his last election by
22 points" thing. Not exactly a ringing endorsement from his home state, eh?
</p>

<p>
Somewhere David Axelrod is smiling.
</p>

<p>
The rest of us? Not so much.
</p>

<p>
That had to be the most pathetic "debate" yet. More like a circular firing 
squad. Hell, after watching Newt complain about Mitt's wealth, Mitt mock Newt's
consulting fees, Santorum whine peevishly, and Paul answer every question
with "gold standard!", <em>I'm</em> thinking of taking a second look at
that Obama fellow. At least he <em>acts</em> presidential. Those four
turkeys belong back in kindergarten. 
</p>

<p>
Is it too much to ask for the GOP to put forth a Real Candidate? Are these
four bozos our A Team?
</p>

<p>
<i>Shudder</i>.
</p>

<p>
Meanwhile down in Georgia, 
<a href="http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/georgia-court-told-obama-slam-dunk-disqualified/">
a backwoods country judge breathed new life into the Birther sideshow</a>
yesterday. Because that's just what we need, more irrelevant posturing 
that can only reflect badly on Obama's opponents. 
</p>

<p>
Now Barry gets to again paint the Republicans as total nutjobs by building
up whackos like Jerome Corsi and Orly Taitz into convenient strawmen, who
he'll then whack into the next county.
</p>

<p>
The American public believes he's already answered the question. Right now
that's what matters, and we have bigger fish to fry. Give it up.
</p>

<p>
There's a 
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzuGFyMM5h8&feature=player_embedded">
video</a> making the rounds of Joe Biden faking an Indian accent
during a campaign event in New Hampshire. He starts out mocking credit card
call center employees, then catches himself. So I click on over to 
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzuGFyMM5h8&feature=player_embedded">
YouTube</a> to see what the fuss is about, and the first thing that comes
up is this comment:
</p>

<p class="quoted">
I don't see the issue here. He impersonates a vice president every waking 
second and no one gives a shit.
</p>

<p>
I spewed coffee all over my monitor!

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/GOP" rel="tag">GOP</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/debate" rel="tag">debate</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Florida" rel="tag">Florida</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Republican" rel="tag">Republican</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/CNN" rel="tag">CNN</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/birthers" rel="tag">birthers</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Joe-Biden" rel="tag">Joe-Biden</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/election</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">friday-fratricide-01-27-12</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Michelle Obama&#39;s War On Pizza</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/news/michelle-obama-war-on-pizza.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Pizza is no longer one of the four food groups? Michelle Obama, taking a page
out of the Nurse Bloomberg playbook, has decided she's
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/01/not_even_pizza_is_safe_in_late.html">
The First Lunch Lady</a>, and pizza is being replaced. With vegetables.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
The first major nutritional overhaul of school meals in more than 15 years 
means most offerings &mdash; including the always popular pizza &mdash; will 
come with less sodium, more whole grains and a wider selection of fruits and 
vegetables on the side.
</p>
<p>
First lady Michelle Obama and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced the 
new guidelines during a visit Wednesday with elementary students. 
</p>
</div>

<p>
All our children are belong to the nanny state.
</p>

<p>
The government knows best! Your kids will eat whatever Michelle Obama tells 
them to eat. So, out with pizza and in with <em>turkey tacos!</em>

<p class="quoted">
After the announcement, [they] went through the line with students and ate 
turkey tacos with brown rice, black bean and corn salad and fruit with the 
children in the Parklawn Elementary lunchroom.
</p>

<p>
Trust me, I'm sure the kids were just being polite. Sophie's school jumped
on the "healthy choices" menu bandwagon last year. Take a guess how much food 
is wasted each day. 
</p>

<p>
Go ahead, guess.
</p>

<p>
<em>Most of it</em>. Especially on turkey hot dog day. Those things are
<em>vile</em>. Jesus, coming in from the desert after 40 days and 40 nights,
would sooner order a pizza than eat one. If the army served them at Gitmo
Amnesty International would call it torture. And they'd be right.
</p>

<p>
So this line from the story struck me as particularly funny:
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Mrs. Obama said youngsters will learn better if they don't have growling 
stomachs at school.
</p>

<p>
In that regard, I'd have to say the food kids actually eat is way better than 
any fru-fru stuff they'll just chuck into the garbage, isn't it? Give 'em a 
slice of pizza and they'll be well fed. Give 'em turkey tacos with brown rice, 
black beans, and corn salad and they'll be begging mom to stop for pizza on the 
way home.  Not to mention that whole "growling stomachs" thing at school.
</p>

<p>
And as it turns out, Mrs. Obama is barking up the wrong tree anyway. From
no less of a right-wing rag than <i>The New York Times</i> comes 
<a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/24/health/research/study-finds-no-childhood-obesity-link-to-school-junk-food.html?_r=1">
this:</a>
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
In the fight against childhood obesity, communities all over the country are 
banning the sale of sweets and salty snacks in public schools. But a new study 
suggests that the strategy may be ineffective. 
</p>
<p>
The researchers compared children's weight in schools where junk food was sold
and in schools where it was banned. The scientists also evaluated [students] 
who moved into schools that sold junk food with those who did not, and children 
who never attended a school that sold snacks with those who did. And they 
compared children who always attended schools with snacks with those who 
moved out of such schools. 
</p>
<p>
No matter how the researchers looked at the data, they could find 
<a href="http://soe.sagepub.com/content/85/1/23.abstract">
no correlation at all between obesity and attending a school where sweets and 
salty snacks were available</a>. 
</p>
</div>

<p>
Imagine that. No correlation between school lunch choices and childhood obesity.
</p>

<p>
None. It's a non-sequitor.
</p>

<p>
Ah, we know what's really going on here. Childhood obesity is the <em>excuse</em>. 
Control is the goal. Control over every aspect of our children's lives. It's
what the Obamas and their nanny state counterparts have always been after.
They want to dictate how we live our lives. For our own good, of course! 
</p>

<p>
People who grow up to make their own choices might choose poorly. Why, they
might even choose to vote for a Republican! We can't have that, better enact
a few more regulations while nobody's looking. 
</p>

<p>
Seriously. When it comes to government deciding what we can do with our bodies, 
the liberal bogeyman of pro-life Republicans wanting to invade the womb is
nothing compared to even one day of heavy-handed nanny-state regulatory diktats.
</p>

<p>
When I was a kid there were no such things as bike helmets or seat belts or
5-point-restraint infant seats. No booster seats or airbags on tricycles either.
Nonetheless, we survived. We did! Now the police run roadblock checkpoints and
hand out whopping tickets for an unbuckled back seat teenager. I think if they
find a mother with a baby on her lap they impound the car and turn the kid 
over to DYFS.
</p>

<p>
We can't be trusted to choose our own light bulbs, but the liberals will insist 
a 13 year old girl is fully qualified to condemn her unborn child to death, 
without any parental input. She's entitled to <em>privacy</em>. But adults
aren't entitled to decent illumination?
</p>

<p>
And on the day before her 21st birthday, that same girl can walk into Planned 
Parenthood to get another abortion, no questions asked.. But if afterwards she 
goes into a bar and orders a beer, it's a <em>felony</em>. 
</p>

<p>
Yeah, I know I'm way off on a tangent. But this shit really burns my shorts.
</p>

<p>
Michelle Obama can go pound sand up her ass. <em>I</em> decide what my kid eats.
Not some bureaucrat. And certainly not an unelected holier-than-thou busybody
who's deluded herself into believing people actually care what she thinks.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/obesity" rel="tag">obesity</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Michelle-Obama" rel="tag">Michelle-Obama</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/pizza" rel="tag">pizza</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/school-lunch" rel="tag">school-lunch</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/nanny-state" rel="tag">nanny-state</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/news</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">michelle-obama-war-on-pizza</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Wednesday&#39;s Worrisome Wickedness, the SOTU War on Wealth edition</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/misc/wednesday-worrisome-wickedness-01-25-12.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Of all the class warriors in the universe, Barack Obama is the class-warfarest.
Or should that be "war-<em>fair</em>-est?" <i>Mirror, mirror, on the wall, 
who's the class-warfairest of all?</i> OK, I'll stop now.
</p>

<p>
No I won't. Barry laid it on thick last night. The rich have what he wants.
And he's gonna take it. Because he killed Bin Laden with his bare hands! And
he got a flag. Which he looks at every day.
</p>

<p>
Other than that Barry can't run on his record. So we get a new war, a War on 
Wealth. Remember, Warren Buffet pays less taxes than his secretary! It's an 
outrage! It's ruining the State Of Our Union. Or at least the state of
Barry's re-election campaign.
</p>

<p>
I am so sick and tired of hearing about Warren Buffett and his secretary,
especially since she's been promoted to the role of arm candy for Moochelle. 
For starters, I don't want to see Mitt Romney's tax returns; I want to see 
Warren Buffett's tax returns. And his hob-nobbing secretary's too.
</p>

<p>
Why? Because we might learn a few things. Like that ole Warren makes his money
the old-fashioned way, via dividends. Which were already taxed once as 
<em>corporate profits</em> before landing in his bank account to be taxed 
<em>again</em>. And his secretary is paid a salary, which Warren gets to take
as a pre-tax <em>deduction</em> against his profits.
</p>

<p>
Anybody wanna bet the 
<a href="http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2012/01/mitt-romneys-true.html">
effective</a> (corporate + personal) tax rate on Warren's dividends 
<em>exceeds</em> his secretary's tax rate?
</p>

<p>
Nah, I didn't think so. Too bad you can't fit that into a sound bite though.
</p>

<p>
Let's see, what else was "unfair?" Mortgages! That evil guy Barney Frank
made Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac give unaffordable mortgages to unsuspecting
middle-class homeowners who never thought their government would lie to them.
</p>

<p>
Hah! Just kidding! Malicious bankers manipulated borrowers into robo-signing
incomprehensible legal documents, then stole their houses and gave them to
#Occupy Wall Street. Or something. But Barry's gonna fix everything!
</p>

<p>
He'll tax the banks some more! And let everybody refinance for free! With
an extra $3,000 check thrown in for good measure! Because that's <em>fair!</em>
And I'm running out of exclamation points&hellip;!
</p>

<p>
But you get the idea. Free money for deadbeats, because rich people have too
much and the UAW blew through all that taxpayer cash we gave them faster than
shit through a goose so it's time for another humongous bailout.
</p>

<p>
Has anyone seen personal responsibility lately? I think it's locked up inside
Richard Cordray's desk.
</p>

<p>
Bottom line? All 57 states in our union are strong. Except 
<a href="http://www.conservativecommune.com/2012/01/blue-illinois-unpaid-bills-downgrades-and-pensions/">
Illinois</a>, and probably California. Better re-elect Barry just in case 
though. He killed Bin Laden! Who gave him a nice flag.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obama" rel="tag">Obama</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/SOTU" rel="tag">SOTU</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/class-warfare" rel="tag">class-warfare</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/misc</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">wednesday-worrisome-wickedness-01-25-12</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>John Galt vs Barry&#39;s class warfare tax plan - everybody stop working at $999,999</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/obama_watch/stop-working-at-999999.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Of all the dumb ideas in Barry's <strike>campaign kickoff</strike> State Of
The Union speech none was dumber than his "at some point you've made enough
money" 30% minimum tax rate on incomes over $1,000,000 per year.
</p>

<p>
Here's my idea. Every entrepreneur in America stops working at $999,999.
Don't earn $1 more. Because if you do, you'll have to write a check for 300 
Grand to Saul Alinsky's wealth redistribution fund.
</p>

<p>
And what if your employees lose out? Maybe because you've closed your office 
until January 1st, and you certainly won't be paying them for not working to 
increase your taxes?
</p>

<p>
<em>Fuck 'em</em>. They're probably voting for President Golf Pants anyway.
So they're his problem.
</p>

<p>
Barry says his demagoguery isn't "class warfare." 
</p>

<p>
Of course it is.
</p>

<p>
So let's declare war on <em>him</em>.
</p>

<p>
I'm betting the productive class is more powerful than the parasite class.
</p>

<p>
We'll show them what happens when they run out of other people's money.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obama" rel="tag">Obama</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/SOTU" rel="tag">SOTU</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/class-warfare" rel="tag">class-warfare</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/taxes" rel="tag">taxes</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/obama_watch</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">stop-working-at-999999</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Chris Christie&#39;s judicial nominations make me wonder if he really isn&#39;t a Democratic Party plant</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/christie-judicial-diversity-no-exp-req.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Well I guess the good news is Chris Christie didn't elevate his good buddy,
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/islam/christie-defends-sharia-judge-nominee.html">
Sharia-compliant, terrorist-sympathizing Superior Court Judge Sohail Mohammed</a> 
to one of the two vacancies on the NJ State Supreme Court.
</p>

<p>
But the bad news is 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/01/christies_historic_appointment.html">
he just picked two guys with no judicial experience whatsoever</a>, and touted 
their <em>diversity</em> as their major qualification. 
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
Stressing the importance of maintaining diversity at the highest levels of New 
Jersey's judiciary, Gov. Chris Christie Monday nominated an openly gay 
African-American mayor and a Korean-American assistant attorney general to the 
Supreme Court.
</p>
<p>
In a move he called "historic," the Republican governor named Bruce Harris, a 
Republican who was elected mayor of Chatham Borough in November, and Phillip 
Kwon, who worked under Christie when he was U.S. attorney.
</p>
<p>
"Not only do their different backgrounds and career paths bring distinctive, 
important perspectives to the court, Bruce and Phil also capture our state's
diversity," Christie said at a Statehouse news conference. 
</p>
</div>

<p>
So that's what qualifies you to be a Supreme Court Justice? "Diversity" and
"perspectives?" Hey, it's all they've got. No paper trail. No previous 
experience as a lower court judge <i>(not even traffic court!)</i>. No legal 
scholarship or opinions they've authored which might hint at their judicial 
philosophy.
</p>

<p>
Just a blatant sop to Identity Politics. Well that, along with Christie's hunch
they'll do the right thing.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
He said he did not ask Kwan and Harris about specific cases but "my expectation 
is I've nominated two justices who understand the appropriate role of the courts
in our system of government."
</p>

<p>
And Chris Christie calls himself a Conservative? Bwhahahaha! Conservatives pick
judges like Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. Conservatives don't need to
seek out a diverse perspective, we look for adherence to original intent. 
Conservatives aren't focused on demographic profiles, intellectual rigor is 
more our speed.
</p>

<p>
Democrats and RINOs play quota games. So deep down, which one is Chris Christie?
</p>

<p>
Now get this, check out the guy who's most excited about these appointments. 
He's the chief activist pushing <em>gay "marriage"</em> in New Jersey.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Steve Goldstein, the chief executive of Garden State Equality, a gay rights 
organization, said he was stunned when Christie informed him of [Harris'] 
nomination. "As I told the governor right then and there, you could have 
picked me up off the floor," he said. 
</p>

<p>
Why do you suppose Chris Christie felt the need to explain his Supreme Court
choices to a gay rights activist?
</p>

<p>
Allow me to spell it out for you.
</p>

<p>
Our state legislature has made enacting gay "marriage" 
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/dems-wont-give-up-on-gay-marriage.html">
their #1 priority</a> this year.
</p>

<p>
Chris Christie claims he's opposed to gay "marriage," and said he'll veto the 
bill if it reaches his desk.
</p>

<p>
But <em>wink, wink, nudge, nudge</em> he's just <em>historically</em> appointed
two new members of the NJ State Supreme Court &mdash; an openly gay man and the 
attorney currently overseeing State Police compliance with a "no racial 
profiling" consent decree. It's the very same court where a challenge to New 
Jersey's Civil Unions law is 
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/gay-marriage-heads-to-court.html">
currently headed</a>. With Steve Goldstein leading the charge. And Chris Christie 
whispering in his ear about <em>diversity</em>, giving Steve the vapors.
</p>

<p>
Hmmm. 
</p>

<p>
If by some <em>unexpected</em> chance that court then goes and finds a 
Constitutional Right to gay "marriage?" <em>Don't blame Chris Christie!</em>
It's the gosh-darned activist judiciary messing things up again! He's opposed
to it. He said so!
</p>

<p>
Believe that, and I've got a bridge in Brooklyn you can have, cheap.
</p>

<p>
Because The Fix Is In. 

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Chris-Christie" rel="tag">Chris-Christie</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Bruce-Harris" rel="tag">Bruce-Harris</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Phillip-Kwon" rel="tag">Phillip-Kwon</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/gay-marriage" rel="tag">gay-marriage</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/nj_politics</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">christie-judicial-diversity-no-exp-req</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>NJ Supreme Court: Towns can ban Free Speech because it&#39;s available in New York</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/news/free-speech-ok-only-out-of-state.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
NIMBY just became NIMS &mdash;
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/01/not_in_my_state_nj_court_rules.html">
Not In My State</a>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
A long legal battle to shut down a nude juice bar in Sayreville took a new turn 
Thursday when the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that the availability of strip 
clubs in neighboring states could be used as part of an argument for keeping 
them out of local communities here.
</p>
<p>
The high court's 5-1 ruling would allow towns to make the argument that a 
sexually oriented business wasn't needed in their municipality because club 
owners could locate in New York or Pennsylvania.
</p>
</div>

<p>
The U.S. Supreme Court has <a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/nude-dancing">
long established</a> that nude dancing is a form of Free Speech, protected by 
the First Amendment. Reasonable zoning restrictions can be enacted so long as
they are not exclusionary in nature.
</p>

<p>
Apparently the NJ Supreme Court has adopted a very elastic view of "exclusionary."
</p>

<p>
Which in my mind is actually good! Because it sure seems like a reversal of
their own idiotic rulings in the various <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Laurel_doctrine">
Mount Laurel</a> "affordable housing" lawsuits. Those rulings said essentially 
"zoning be damned!" Every town in New Jersey is <em>required</em> to provide a 
quota of "affordable housing" within its borders, even if it means bulldozing
perfectly good single family homes to do it.
</p>

<p>
The availability of surplus "affordable housing" in a neighboring town 
<i>(nevermind a neighboring state!)</i> was <em>expressly</em> 
<a href="http://fairsharehousing.org/pdf/PR_galloway_decision_July-7-2008.pdf">
dismissed by the courts</a> as insufficient. The "affordable housing" 
<em>must</em> be located within the borders of each and every town.
</p>

<p>
Alas, the made-up right to "affordable housing" is not enshrined in the 
Constitution; Freedom of Speech is. Yet in the topsy-turvy world of NJ land 
use litigation towns can now exclude activities specifically protected by
the First Amendment but they must accept a trailer park on every block?
</p>

<p>
Yeah, that makes sense.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/free-speech" rel="tag">free-speech</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Club-XXXV" rel="tag">Club-XXXV</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/strip-clubs" rel="tag">strip-clubs</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/affordable-housing" rel="tag">affordable-housing</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/news</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">free-speech-ok-only-out-of-state</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Pipeline Dreams Busted By Green Schemes edition</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk24.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
When Barry took office gas was $1.81 a gallon. This week it hit 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/01/nj_gas_prices_rise_slightly_in.html">
$3.31</a> here in New Jersey, only 7 cents below the national average of $3.38.
</p>

<p>
Wouldn't it be great if there was a plentiful source of crude oil, maybe only
a few miles north of us, and 
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/news/obama-v-christie-on-pipelines.html">
a reliable way</a> to get that oil to our refineries?
</p>

<p>
It's almost like Obama's energy policy is "no energy," isn't it? I mean when
he claims that <em>three years</em> isn't enough time to study the Keystone XL
pipeline proposal <i>(and like Newt said, we won World War II in less than
three years!)</i>, and then he goes and puts essentially all of our uranium
producing lands <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jan/09/grand-canyon-uranium-mining-banned">
off-limits</a> to mining, what other conclusion can I make?
</p>

<p>
Remember kids, solar panels are awesome, except when the sun goes down. But hey,
who needs light at night?
</p>

<p>
You gotta wonder where Barry's priorities are at when even his own people are
chanting <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/204621-obamas-jobs-council-calls-for-expanded-drilling">
Drill, Baby, Drill</a>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
President Obama's jobs council called Tuesday for an "all-in approach" to 
energy policy that includes expanded oil-and-gas drilling as well as expediting 
energy projects like pipelines.
</p>
<p>
"[W]e should allow more access to oil, natural gas and coal opportunities on 
federal lands," states the year-end report released Tuesday by the President's 
Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.
</p>
</div>

<p>
We're "all-in" alright, all-in deep shit. No coal. No oil. No nuclear. But
look, windmills! Which, of course, <a href="http://www.startribune.com/local/137803668.html">
kill bald eagles by the truckload</a>. Because killing the symbol of America is 
right up there on his priority list with killing the spirit of America too.
</p>

<p>
The Obama energy policy &mdash; Freeze In The Dark.
</p>

<p>
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/rule5/jillian-barberie-10.jpg" class="iright" />
OK, so Jillian's back this week, and she reminds me that this is supposed to
be a <em>jobs</em> report. Well we need energy to create jobs, don't we? But
yeah, she's right, let's see what Barry's been up to on the jobs front.
</p>

<p>
And wouldn't you know it, but he's declared <em>another</em>
<a href="http://rightwingnews.com/economy/hooray-obama-plans-yet-another-lazer-like-focus-on-jobs-and-the-economy/">
laser-like focus on jobs!</a>
</p>

<p>
Well, if by "laser-like focus" you actually mean the same sorry-ass plan he's
been humping, the one which props up some more public employee unions with 
another $447 Billion of borrowed money, then yeah, he's definitely focused 
like a laser on "jobs."
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Is Obama still pushing that diarrhea of a plan, which includes the same 
measures that failed in the Stimulus, and only save jobs in the public sector, 
along with helping out union jobs, mostly in the public sector? Giving people 
education, particularly college education, doesn't actually create jobs, and 
creates depression among those who get their sheepskin in social studies and 
realize that they are only qualified to work as a burger flipper, if there are 
any burger flipper jobs around.
</p>

<p>
It's the "unionistas, please vote for Obama" jobs package, and it's got no
chance of actually passing the House, so it's all for show, and we know it.
</p>

<p>
Elsewhere this week, 
<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-10/metlife-most-of-4-300-at-mortgage-unit-to-lose-jobs.html">
MetLife quit the mortgage business</a>, putting another 4,000 Americans out on
the street.
</p>

<p>
Perhaps that's because no one is taking out mortgages in this economy. Besides,
why worry about getting a mortgage when Obama-endorsed #Occupy 
<a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/ows_home_invasion_z9ApqDP6Q0boFviq8CjvAL">
will steal your house?</a>
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Occupy Wall Street protesters announced with great fanfare last month that they 
moved a homeless family into a "foreclosed" Brooklyn home &mdash; even though 
they knew the house belonged to a struggling single father desperately trying 
to renegotiate his mortgage.
</p>

<p>
Re-elect Obama &mdash; <em>from each according to his ability, to each
according to his needs</em> &mdash; and he'll turn us all into beggars
'cause they're easier to please.
</p>

<p>
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/rule5/jillianbarberie-bed.jpg" />
</p>

<p>
<br clear="all" />
-----------<br />
Previously:<br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk23.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Downgrade Fever is Catchy edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk22.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Short Term Gain For Long Term Pain edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk21.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Year End Wrapup Unhappy New Year Edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk19.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Debbie Wasserman Schultz Reality Check edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk18.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report: the Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk17.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Incredibly Shrinking Labor Force edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk16.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, Our Dickensian Future Edition</a>

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obama" rel="tag">Obama</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/jobs" rel="tag">jobs</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Keystone-XL" rel="tag">Keystone-XL</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Met-Life" rel="tag">Met-Life</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/unions" rel="tag">unions</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/economy</category>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">obama-jobs-report-wk24</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>On Sunday 1/22, ask them what they mean by "choice"</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/feminists/ask-them-what-they-mean-by-choice-day.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
<a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/2012/01/announcing-2nd-annual-ask-them-what-they-mean-by-choice-blog-day-january-22/">
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/whatchoice2.jpg" class="iright" /></a>
Game on people. Sunday is the 39th anniversary of the odious Roe v Wade Supreme
Court decision. Thirty nine years of legal infanticide. Untold millions
consigned to brutal, painful death with the stroke of a pen.
</p>

<p>
To commemorate the occasion the NARAL death cult is springing into action.
They're encouraging supporters to take to the social media airwaves on Sunday 
and talk up the benefits of "choice." 
</p>

<p>
Pro-life nurse Jill Stanek is appalled <i>(as am I)</i> and she wants to do 
something to counter them.
</p>

<p>
Her plan is simple. 
<a href="http://www.jillstanek.com/2012/01/announcing-2nd-annual-ask-them-what-they-mean-by-choice-blog-day-january-22/">
<em>Ask them what they mean by "choice."</em></a> Rain on their parade.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
On January 22, any time you read pro-aborts spouting obscure "choice" rhetoric 
on a blog, website, Facebook, or Twitter, call them out on it. Ask them to 
explain what the "choice" euphemism means. Tweeters plan to use their 
#Tweet4Choice hashtag.
</p>

<p>
Get specifics. 
</p>

<p>
Because <em>we</em> know what "choice" means. It means "dead babies."
</p>

<p>
I'll be there. Will you join me in standing up for innocent life?
</p>

<p class="indent">
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/my-moms-gonna-kill-me.jpg" />
</p>

<p>
She wouldn't drown a puppy. Why can she legally suck the life from the
beating heart of her unborn child?

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/abortion" rel="tag">abortion</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Jill-Stanek" rel="tag">Jill-Stanek</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/#Tweet4Choice" rel="tag">#Tweet4Choice</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NARAL" rel="tag">NARAL</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/feminists</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ask-them-what-they-mean-by-choice-day</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Thursday Throwdown, Newt Gingrich bitch-slaps CNN toady, and other debate reax</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/thursday-throwdown-01-19-12.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
OK, so <em>Sophie</em> said I had to watch this debate. Because her class is
studying the Constitution. In fourth grade. And she wanted to ask me questions.
</p>

<p>
The CNN lead-in was telling. Their dream team salivated at the prospect of
Newt Gringrich addressing his ex-wife's allegations. The excitement was
palpable, and Wolf Blitzer seemed like he was about to erupt in his pants.
</p>

<p>
I wonder how Wolfie felt after Newt bitch-slapped John King. 
<a href="http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2012/01/does-angry-bellowing-help-newt-gingrich.html">
Donald Douglas has the video</a>.
</p>

<div class="indent">
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/TvC5OnNkRDA?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div>

<p>
That there was a thing of beauty. Oh, and <em>shrinkage!</em>
</p>

<p>
Newt's always been keen to run against the media, and by golly he got to do
it tonight. If there's anyone left at ABC with a shred of decency, he'd
hang his head in shame. Sadly, there's no chance of that.
</p>

<p>
The obvious money shot &mdash; <i>I'll let Barack Obama bring a Teleprompter
to a battle of wits</i> &mdash; was sadly overshadowed by CNN"s miserable 
attempt at entrapment.
</p>

<p>
Newt floats like a butterfly and stings like a bee&hellip;
</p>

<p>
As for the rest, I'll let Sophie recap. 
</p>

<div class="indent">
<p>
"Why doesn't Ron Paul answer the questions?"
</p>
<p>
"Why is Rick Santorum so angry?"
</p>
</div>

<p>
Alas, answers, I do not have. But that's OK, because the voters are about to 
send both of those guys back to the showers.
</p>

<p>
The media has made this election about debating skills. It's bogus, but it's
also the reason Rick Perry is at home on the couch. OK then, Newt Gingrich 
will run rhetorical rings around Captain Teleprompter. Which is why they're 
so keen to destroy him.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/CNN" rel="tag">CNN</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/GOP" rel="tag">GOP</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/South-Carolina" rel="tag">South-Carolina</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Newt-Gingrich" rel="tag">Newt-Gingrich</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/election</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">thursday-throwdown-01-19-12</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Rick Perry drops out, endorses Newt. WyBlog 0 for 2 in the presidential picker dept.</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/perry-out-wyblog-0-for-2.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Sigh. Now I'm 0 for 2. Those of you who were around in 2008 will undoubtedly
recall my unbridled enthusiasm for Fred Thompson's candidacy. Look how well
that worked out. 
</p>

<p>
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/rick-perry-thx-banner.jpg" class="iright" />
So, no sooner had I put the Rick Perry for President banner up there on the
top left when the wheels started coming off his campaign. It's the WyBlog
curse, because <a href="http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/01/perry-dropping-out/">
Rick Perry is calling it quits</a>.
</p>

<p>
Hey, if I endorse Romney next do you think he'll falter too?
</p>

<p>
Perry's gonna 
<a href="http://www.thepiratescove.us/2012/01/19/breaking-rick-perry-to-supposedly-suspend-campaign-today/">
line up behind Newt</a>, mostly because Newt isn't Mittens and Santorum and 
Saint Ron are unelectable.
</p>

<p>
But ABC <i>(the All Barack Channel!)</i> is already locked and loaded with
<a href="http://theothermccain.com/2012/01/19/fear-and-loathing-breakfast-of-champions/">
both barrels aimed at Newt</a>. The media which can't be bothered to interview
a single one of 
<a href="http://www.mofopolitics.com/2009/07/22/larry-sinclair-obama-and-murdered-gay-choir-conductor-donald-young-were-lovers/">
Obama's ex-boyfriends</a> is salivating at the prospect of airing every scrap 
of dirty laundry Newt's ex-wife is willing to dish out.
</p>

<p>
So Wife Number Two's bombshell is, 
<a href="http://www.punditandpundette.com/2012/01/going-through-newts-baggage.html">
Newt cheated on her with Wife Number Three!</a> Forgetting, conveniently, that 
he also cheated <em>with her</em> on (dying) Wife Number One. Listen toots, 
it's not like you didn't <em>know</em> what kind of man you were fooling around 
with. Both before, and yes after you married him.
</p>

<p>
Anyway, Tammy's been on Newt's bandwagon for a while now. Ayup, electoral
discord in the WyHouse! But not anymore. If Rick Perry's getting behind 
Newt, then I guess I am too. 
</p>

<p>
It feels kinda like rooting for the Giants though. My heart's not in it, if
you know what I mean. <i>(Dude, go with it, it's the Syphilitic Camel Rule! 
-- Ed.)</i>
</p>

<p>
Still,
<a href="http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/01/18/sarah-palin-endorses-newt-gingrich-in-south-carolina/">
Sarah Palin's a Newt fan</a>, that's gotta count for something, right? 
</p>

<p>
More importantly though, 
<a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/18/newt-palin-will-play-a-major-role-in-my-administration/">
he's a Sarah Palin fan</a>. Can we hope for a Gingrich - Palin ticket? Or 
am I tempting fate again with another jolt of the WyCurse?

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Rick-Perry" rel="tag">Rick-Perry</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Newt-Gingrich" rel="tag">Newt-Gingrich</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Mitt-Romney" rel="tag">Mitt-Romney</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/2012" rel="tag">2012</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Sarah-Palin" rel="tag">Sarah-Palin</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/election</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">perry-out-wyblog-0-for-2</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Obama kills Keystone XL, Chris Christie greenlights Marcellus Shale gas pipeline in NJ</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/news/obama-v-christie-on-pipelines.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
It's a tale of two pipelines. Both adamantly opposed by the usual rabid
bunch of econuts. Both key to establishing American energy independence.
</p>

<p>
And it's a tale of two leaders. One desperately seeking to appease every
radical constituency by tearing down two centuries of industrial achievement.
The other pragmatic and decisive, cognizant of risk, yet unwilling to let
opportunity pass us by.
</p>

<p>
In the end, 
<a href="http://motorcitytimes.com/mct/2012/01/obama-rejects-keystone-xl-pipeline-and-economic-growth/">
Obama's rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline project</a> was as
predictable as it was anticlimactic. He promised to tilt at windmills while
sending gasoline and electricity prices through the roof, and he continues to
deliver.
</p>

<p>
But lost in yesterday's 
<a href="http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2012/01/i-love-smell-of-red-on-red-warfare-in.html">
recriminations</a> was Chris Christie's decision to
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/01/highlands_council_expected_to.html">
forge ahead with an ambitious natural gas pipeline</a>, one that is also slated
to traverse "sensitive" environmental areas. In response to boilerplate Sierra
Club doomsaying one of his Highlands Commissioners put it thusly:
</p>

<p class="quoted">
"An adequate supply of natural gas is equal to the need for drinking water." 
</p>

<p>
Indeed. And so a pipeline, stretching from the Marcellus Shale region of
Pennsylvania, traversing the Highlands watershed, and terminating in Mahwah
will soon be a reality. With it comes a 55% increase in the quantity of
natural gas available to New Jerseyans. And of course, jobs. Good paying,
sorely needed jobs. Clean, reliable energy too.
</p>

<p>
That's a win for New Jersey, and a win for America. And it's one more reason
why Barack Obama must be defeated in November. Yes, even if that means we have
to get used to saying "President Romney."

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obama" rel="tag">Obama</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Chris-Christie" rel="tag">Chris-Christie</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Keystone-XL" rel="tag">Keystone-XL</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Marcellus-Shale" rel="tag">Marcellus-Shale</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/environment" rel="tag">environment</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/news</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">obama-v-christie-on-pipelines</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Weary Wednesday Wanderers, Barry&#39;s goin&#39; to Disney World!</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/misc/weary-wednesday-wanderers-01-18-12.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
It's time for another of Barry's "working vacations," 
<a href="http://weaselzippers.us/2012/01/17/obama-going-to-disney-world/">
this time at the Magic Kingdom!</a>
</p>

<p class="quoted">
President Barack Obama will visit Walt Disney World during a planned trip to 
Orlando on Thursday, according to a White House aide. There, he will "unveil a 
strategy that will significantly help boost tourism and travel," the aide 
added.
</p>

<p>
Aw geez, not another <em>strategy</em>.
</p>

<p>
Must resist making Mickey Mouse White House jokes.
</p>

<p>
Barry's gonna be a little lonely though. Any Democrat who's anybody is
<em>coincidentally</em> leaving town.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
It doesn't appear, however, that he'll get much love from local politicians. 
Aides to U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson said the Florida Democrat was unlikely to attend 
because the office "got word too late" of the visit and had meetings planned in
other parts of the state. And Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer is scheduled to be in 
Washington that day for a meeting of the U.S. Conference of Mayors.
</p>

<p>
<a href="http://attractionsmagazine.com/blog/2012/01/17/president-obama-coming-to-disney-world-no-guest-access-but-entertainment-options-have-been-added/">
Park guests won't be allowed within a mile of Dear Leader</a>, probably because
the use of foul language is frowned upon at Disney World. Or maybe they were
afraid folks wouldn't even part with an "A" ticket for the chance to see him.
</p>

<p>
So today's the day 
<a href="http://troglopundit.wordpress.com/2012/01/17/just-so-you-know-the-trog-will-not-be-going-dark-on-wednesday-to-protest-sopa/">
the internet goes dark</a>, or something. I just clicked on a Wikipedia link 
and got some kind of Black Screen of Doom. Yes, the libtard poseurs that censor 
anyone who doesn't toe the far-left line when it comes to homosexual "rights" 
or Palestinian statehood are cheesed off because Congress might outlaw stealing 
digital music and movies. Anonymous twits who unilaterally get to decide if 
you're "noteworthy" enough to warrant an entry in their Self-Important Book Of 
All Knowledge are actually complaining because an unelected bureaucrat might 
find a particular website to be of no redeeming value whatsoever.
</p>

<p>
I'd direct you to their page for "irony," but it's offline today.
</p>

<p>
Coming next week, hospitals lock their doors to protest Obamacare!
</p>

<p>
We all knew that health care costs were going up, 
<a href="http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/01/16/bronx-hospital-mistakenly-bills-patients-for-millions/">
but this is ridiculous</a>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
Unemployed doorman Alexis Rodriguez says he almost became ill when he received 
a $44.8 million bill from the Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center.
</p>
<p>
Rodriguez tells the New York Daily News that he was hospitalized last spring 
with pneumonia and was afraid the bill was legit.
</p>
</div>

<p>
I guess he didn't get an Obamacare waiver.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Turns out the company that prepares the bills had mistakenly put the invoice 
number in the space where the invoice amount should go.
</p>

<p>
Pfew! But the fact he thought the bill might be legit? Wasn't Obamacare supposed
to <em>cut</em> costs?
</p>

<p>
How's 
<a href="http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/2012/01/17/woman-offers-mcdonalds-customers-sex-in-exchange-for-chicken-nuggets/">
this</a> for putting a whole new spin on McDonald's "I'm Lovin' It" ad campaign?
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
Khadijah Baseer, a 31-year-old Los Angeles woman was jailed Wednesday after she 
allegedly offered sexual favors to several McDonald's customers for a free 
order of chicken nuggets.
</p>
<p>
According to Burbank police, Baseer reportedly approached several vehicles at 
a McDonald's drive-thru around 11:00 p.m., then opened their car doors and 
asked for free chicken nuggets in exchange for unspecified sexual favors.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Next week at Burger King she'll demonstrate how it takes two hands to handle
a Whopper.
</p>

<p>
Finally, in a sop to SOPA stoppers, I snarfed this from a friend on Facebook,
because it's too good not to pass along:
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Celebrating this day by pirating Fr. Richard K McFadden's status. He writes, 
"You know the LAST time the government tried to censor the internet resulted 
in a little thing called the War of 1812, when the Challenger blew up over the 
Alamo." Without Wikipedia, how will kids learn things like this? "Those who 
fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it" ~ Apollo Creed, Third President 
of the United States.
</p>

<p>
It's not illegal to steal someone else's Facebook status, is it? Why are those
guys in dark suits talking into their earbuds and staring at me?

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obama" rel="tag">Obama</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Disney-World" rel="tag">Disney-World</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/SOPA" rel="tag">SOPA</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Wikipedia" rel="tag">Wikipedia</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obamacare" rel="tag">Obamacare</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/McDonalds" rel="tag">McDonalds</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/misc</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">weary-wednesday-wanderers-01-18-12</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Chris Christie proposes a 10% across-the-board income tax cut for New Jersey</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/nj_politics/christie-10-pct-income-tax-cut.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Bold Leadership. Fiscal Sanity. Lower Taxes. 
<a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/01/gov_christie_proposes_10_perce.html">
Chris Christie delivers:</a>
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Gov. Chris Christie today proposed a 10 percent reduction in state income taxes 
regardless of income -- phased in over three years -- and restoration of the 
earned-income tax credit that would benefit the state's poorest citizens.
</p>

<p>
As he put it, "Everyone made the sacrifice. Everyone will share in the benefit." 
</p>

<p class="quoted">
"Understand what this means," Christie said in his State of the State message, 
the second one he has delivered since becoming governor in January 2010,. 
"Every New Jerseyan will get a cut in taxes. The working poor. The struggling 
middle class. The new college graduates getting their first job. The senior 
citizens who have already retired. The single mom. The job creators. The 
parents trying to afford to send their son or daughter to college."
</p>

<p>
It's the antithesis of class warfare. So naturally the Democrats have a 
plan of their own. <em>Raise taxes</em>.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
He rejected a proposal by Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver (D-Essex), made hours 
earlier, to increase income taxes on the state's millionaires.
</p>
<p>
"Let others choose tax increases," Christie said. "We choose responsible tax 
cuts to give our overburdened citizens real relief."
</p>
</div>

<p>
I don't think that Sheila Oliver can <em>spell</em> "tax cut."
</p>

<p>
Here's the video. 
</p>

<div class="indent">
<object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" 
codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0">
<param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" />
<param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" />
<param name="flashVars" value="videoId=1398034959001&playerID=651974715001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAPLMIP6E~,BRrRHTAljlF40NofMDxsColEK-8KEsxy&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" />
<param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" />
<param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" />
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" />
<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" 
flashVars="videoId=1398034959001&playerID=651974715001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAPLMIP6E~,BRrRHTAljlF40NofMDxsColEK-8KEsxy&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" 
base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" 
allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash">
</embed>
</object>
</div>

<p>
Hey Mitch McConnell and John Boehner. Are you paying attention?

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Chris-Christie" rel="tag">Chris-Christie</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/NJ-Politics" rel="tag">NJ-Politics</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/taxes" rel="tag">taxes</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/nj_politics</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">christie-10-pct-income-tax-cut</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Free us from the South Carolina Five</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/free-us-from-the-south-carolina-five.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
I didn't watch last night's debate. 
<a href="http://theothermccain.com/2012/01/16/south-carolina-gop-debate/">
Stacy McCain live-blogged on-site</a>, The Daley Gator 
<a href="http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/2012/01/17/daily-benefactor-news-ron-paul-denies-saying-he-wouldnt-have-ordered-bin-laden-raid-in-pakistan-but-heres-the-video/">
caught Ron Paul in another lie</a>, and <a href="http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/01/clarity/">
Professor Jacobson</a> sums up my impression of the trainwreck that is Mitt 
Romney's impending nomination.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
We are on a path to nominate someone who campaigned against Reagan, campaigned 
against the Contract with America, campaigned against those who are pro-Life, 
campaigned against 2d Amendment rights, campaigned against conservatism, and 
designed and enacted the precursor to Obamacare from which he will not back away.
</p>

<p>
Meanwhile the only guy who's never actually lost an election on the merits
<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/perry-might-not-qualify-for-cnns-south-carolina-debate-2012-1">
can't get any traction</a>, because ostensible "conservatives" are enamored by
Rick Santorum's sweater vests and Newt Gingrich's adverbial allegories.
</p>

<p>
And way off in Right Field, <a href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/ron-paul-spirit-76/">
the Ron Paul sideshow</a> pretty much guarantees Romney will get the nod.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
Many of my conservative friends are so busy denouncing Ron Paul and his 
supporters that they can't be bothered to ask themselves, "Why don't we 
have that kind of wild-eyed fanaticism among our supporters?"
</p>

<p>
Yes, what I look for in a candidate is the <em>wild-eyed fanaticism</em> of
his supporters. Substitute "bat-shit insanity" for "wild-eyed fanaticism" and
you'll understand what I mean. Or just go observe wild-eyed fanaticism in 
its natural habitat of North Korea. Because if that's what it takes to be
a Ron Paul supporter, you can count me out.
</p>

<p>
Do we want wild-eyed fanatical <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yq_7251dqc8">
9/11 Truthers</a> driving the GOP bus?
</p>

<p>
Are we ready for a wild-eyed fanatic to 
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/story/2012-01-09/Ron-Paul-Fed-economy/52473466/1">
burn our banking system to the ground</a> in order to purge it of 
<a href="http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/ron-pauls-new-world-order-conspiracy-theory-video/">
The International Jewish Conspiracy?</a>
</p>

<p>
Will you let your kids go play outside when wild-eyed fanatical meth addicts
move in next door because 
<a href="http://spectator.org/archives/2012/01/11/drug-legalization-chic">
Ron Paul legalized drugs?</a>
</p>

<p>
Can Americans sleep soundly at night knowing that the wild-eyed fanatical
Iranians are mass-producing 
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/12/ron-paul-iran-does-not-threaten-our-national-security/">
Ron-Paul-approved</a> nuclear bombs?
</p>

<p>
Ron Paul's popularity does not necessarily imply the soundness of Ron Paul's 
message.
</p>

<p>
Ron Paul's cult followers are gathering converts because the remaining GOP
presidential field is weak, and fractured. Some of us have perhaps been
contributing to the problem by proclaiming "anyone but Mitt Romney." 
</p>

<p>
The electorate has seen "anyone," and is sending us a different message &mdash; 
Romney, <em>because he's not Ron Paul</em>, and you turkeys can't make up your 
minds about any of those other guys. 
</p>

<p>
You know what? They just might be on to something.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/South-Carolina" rel="tag">South-Carolina</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Republican" rel="tag">Republican</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Mitt-Romney" rel="tag">Mitt-Romney</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Newt-Gingrich" rel="tag">Newt-Gingrich</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Rick-Santorum" rel="tag">Rick-Santorum</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Rick-Perry" rel="tag">Rick-Perry</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Ron-Paul" rel="tag">Ron-Paul</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/election</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">free-us-from-the-south-carolina-five</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Motley Monday Modulation, or The Eyes Of DHS Are Upon Us, now with InstaDregs!</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/misc/motley-monday-modulation-01-16-12.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
The Laughing Conservative claims to have found 
<a href="http://laughingconservative.blogspot.com/2012/01/barack-obamas-diary-friday.html">
a super-secret White House memo</a>, <i>written by Barack Obama himself!</i>, 
which spills the beans on the targets of Janet Incompetano's 
<a href="http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/01/homeland-security-monitors-blogs-new-sites-twitter-social-media.html">
DHS blogger surveillance program</a>. There's mention of "that Wysocki guy in NJ." 
</p>

<p>
Uh, oh. I think I'm in trouble.
</p>

<p>
You guys'll come visit me in prison, won't you?
</p>

<p>
And just when I'm on the verge of being almost famous, too. 
<a href="http://troglopundit.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/thanks-for-the-instaseconds-smitty/">
Trog is getting some InstaSeconds</a> (via 
<a href="http://theothermccain.com/2012/01/16/scott-walker-is-a-threat-to-the-status-quo/">Smitty</a>), 
which seems to be his speciality these days. Always a bridesmaid, never a 
bride! Anyway, his sidebar link to me is attracting attention from the 
click-throughers. So I'm benefiting from what I guess could be called Trog's
InstaDregs.
</p>

<p>
Uh, <em>thanks!</em>
</p>

<p>
So let's see, what sort of Right Wing mischief can we get into today? 
<i>Hmmm</i>. Oh, I know! Long before anyone had heard of Steven Colbert 
or Jon Stewart there was Tom Lehrer, back when satire was funny. Here's
a song he did which seems appropriate for Martin Luther King Day.
</p>

<div class="indent">
<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0Vm-8eXFgqA?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div>

<p>
Incidentally, MLK was a <em>Republican</em>. Yes, really. You could look it up.
</p>

<p>
I'm always reluctant to put too much credence into "what 'X' would have 
said" unless, you know, 'X' actually <em>said</em> it. But MLK's niece,
Dr. Alveda King, 
<a href="http://hillbuzz.org/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-was-a-republican-and-hed-be-a-pro-life-social-conservative-if-he-was-alive-today-37610">
makes a compelling case</a> for her famous uncle's pro-life bonafides. It's
certainly something to think about, probably more so than pushing back your
tee time to
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/16/obama-volunteers-on-mlk-day-addresses-controversy-over-memorial-inscription/">
paint slogans on a wall</a>.
</p>

<p>
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/automotivator-angry-birds.jpg" class="iright" />
My wife and daughter are both <em>obsessed</em> with the game Angry Birds.
They play it All The Time. And they're constantly trying to suck me into 
playing too. Feh. 
</p>

<p>
What <em>I</em> really want to create is a game called "Angry <em>Nerds</em>."
</p>

<p>
In my game, you have to solve a partial differential equation before the 
phone zaps you with a jolt of electricity and a blinding flash of light.
</p>

<p>
The higher levels test your knowledge of Star Trek trivia.
</p>

<p>
I think it'd be a hit, don't you?

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/DHS" rel="tag">DHS</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/bloggers" rel="tag">bloggers</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/privacy" rel="tag">privacy</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/MLK" rel="tag">MLK</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/angry-birds" rel="tag">angry-birds</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/misc</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">motley-monday-modulation-01-16-12</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Jon Huntsman drops out, hopes Mitt Romney remembers who he is and sends him back to Red China</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/election/jon-huntsman-back-to-red-china.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Jon Huntsman's 15 minutes are up. The man Stacy McCain nicknamed
<a href="http://theothermccain.com/2012/01/15/good-bye-governor-asterisk/">
Governor Asterisk</a> intends to reassert his footnote-to-history status by
<a href="http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/2012/01/johnny-we-hardly-knew-ye.html">
ending his presidential campaign</a>.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
A man who generated so little excitement that members of his of own campaign 
sometimes misspelled his name, Huntsman leaves the race with a whimper and not 
a bang.
</p>

<p>
But he's got A Plan. He'll endorse the 
<a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/01/09/401168/huntsman-slams-romney-unelectable/">"unelectable"</a> 
Mitt Romney. Because if you've already been Barack Obama's Ambassador to Red 
China, why not try to wangle the same gig from Obama's ideological successor?
</p>

<p>
They deserve each other. You can nominate Mitt Romney and (maybe) send Jon
Huntsman back to Red China, or you can get behind <a href="http://www.rickperry.org/">
a Real Conservative</a> to defeat Barack Obama. What's it gonna be America?

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Jon-Huntsman" rel="tag">Jon-Huntsman</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Mitt-Romney" rel="tag">Mitt-Romney</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/election" rel="tag">election</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/2012" rel="tag">2012</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Republican" rel="tag">Republican</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/election</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">jon-huntsman-back-to-red-china</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The obnoxious little turd that is Mike Bloomberg</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/democrats/mike-bloomberg-obnoxious-turd.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
I have friends who insist Mike Bloomberg is the ideal presidential candidate.
Their hero worhip of NYC's Head Nurse is at best misplaced, and those who
should know better ought to be ashamed of themselves. Because 
<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/288132/bloombergs-law-mark-steyn">
hizzoner is a scoundrel</a>, with no regard whatsoever for the Constitution.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
On his radio show this week, Derb discusses the case of Meredith Graves, the 
Tennessee nurse who, upon visiting the 9/11 memorial in New York and seeing the 
signs forbidding firearms, asked the staff if she could check her pistol 
(lawful and licensed in home state). She was handcuffed, arrested, and now 
faces three and a half years in jail for firearms possession &mdash; for the 
crime of being unaware that the Second Amendment does not apply in New York City.
</p>

<p>
This is the Mike Bloomberg "law and order" machine in full regalia. 
<a href="http://volokh.com/2011/05/18/second-circuit-reverses-judge-weinsteins-order-against-firearms-stores-concurrence-harshly-rebukes-him/">
He plays fast and loose with the law</a> at every turn. And he's never one
to ascribe reasonable doubt:
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
Asked about the case, New York's thuggish mayor decided to 
<a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/01/10/4178012/bloombergs-slander-of-gun-law.html">
add insult to injury</a>:
</p>
<p class="quoted">
Let's assume that she didn't get arrested for carrying a gun. She probably 
would have gotten arrested for the cocaine that was in her pocket.
</p>
<p>
There was no cocaine. The white stuff in her pocket was analyzed by Bloomberg's 
cops and found to be, as the nurse had said it was, aspirin powder. So this 
loathsome slug of a man has slandered an ordinary American citizen on tape in 
front of the world. Why? Because he can.
</p>
</div>

<p>
And because it suits his objectives. He needs middle-class white female felons 
to offset the parade of low-income minority lowlifes his police department is
usually forced to arrest, seeing as how there isn't anyone else spreading
mayhem within a mile of his ivory tower.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
You can be confident that Meredith Graves will be locked up, because it is far 
easier to lock up law-abiding types such as Meredith Graves than it is to 
police the criminals who actually do the murders and muggings. 
</p>

<p>
Rudy Guiliani he ain't. Mayor Mike is the quintessential pandering politician,
broadcasting bland bromides in lieu of countering the contagions which cripple
his once magnificent metropolis. Trans-fats are his enemy, while drug dealers
run rampant. He proclaims that secondhand smoke threatens the foundations of 
civilization, but it's bedbugs whose proliferation actually undermines the 
fabric of our society.
</p>

<p>
In Bloomberg's paradise he'll <a href="http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=113759">
close all the liquor stores</a>, but 
<a href="http://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/news/2003/03/new-york-mayor-backs-needle-exchange-program.aspx">
free needles for junkies</a> are a Constitutional Right.
</p>

<p>
People who find his hegemony alluring are no more than sheep, trading
independent thought for the illusion of nanny state security. When their
city inevitably succumbs to the rot which permeates its core they'll
shake their heads wistfully and wonder which unimplemented utopian scheme
would have precluded their fall from grace.
</p>

<p>
Mike Bloomberg is a nasty little man, and I hope Mrs. Graves sues the pants
off his arrogant ass. As for his acolytes, I can only assume that their
willful myopia conceals a deep-seated hatred of freedom and liberty. His
presidential timbre is decidedly off-key.

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Mike-Bloomberg" rel="tag">Mike-Bloomberg</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Second-Amendment" rel="tag">Second-Amendment</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Meredith-Graves" rel="tag">Meredith-Graves</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/democrats</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">mike-bloomberg-obnoxious-turd</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Downgrade Fever is Catchy edition</title>
      <link>http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk23.html</link>
      <dc:creator>Chris Wysocki</dc:creator>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[
Live by the Euro, die by the Euro. 
<a href="http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/13/black-friday-sp-downgrades-nine-euro-zone-countries/">
On Friday S&P downgraded nine Eurozone countries</a> including former Blue 
Chips France and Austria.
</p>

<div class="quoted">
<p>
S&P cut the ratings of Italy, Spain, Portugal and Cyprus by two notches and the 
standings of France, Austria, Malta, Slovakia and Slovenia by one notch each.
</p>
<p>
The move puts highly indebted Italy on the same BBB+ level as Kazakhstan and 
pushes Portugal into junk status.
</p>
</div>

<p>
Remember when Junk Bonds were cool? Mister we could use a man like Michael
Milken again.
</p>

<p>
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/rule5/chloe_vevrier-phone-02-800sm.jpg" class="iright" />
<i>(By popular demand, Chloe is back for an encore this week. 
I think she's on the phone with her broker&hellip;)</i>
</p>

<p>
And what did I tell you, the unemployment figures were indeed revised upward,
and then 
<a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/12/weekly-jobless-claims-spike-up-24k-to-399k/">
spiked this week to 399K</a>.
</p>

<p>
That's two big jumps in a row. Can Barry make it three? You know he can!
</p>

<p>
Oh, and by the way, 
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/12/us-usa-economy-idUSTRE7BM0AB20120112">
December retail sales were "weak,"</a> the worse they've been in seven months.
Santa kept his wallet in his pocket, unless he spied some really deep
discounts. Alas, low margins do not a recovery make.
</p>

<p>
In response, 
<a href="http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2012/jan/13/cit-reportedly-stops-backing-sears-supplier/">
CIT Group is cutting off supplier loans to Sears</a>.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
The company had a disastrous holiday shopping season, with revenue at stores 
open at least a year falling 5.2 percent during the eight weeks ended that 
ended Christmas Day. The figure is a key indicator of a retailer's health 
because it excludes results from stores recently opened or closed.
</p>

<p>
There's a Sears Hardware in West Caldwell. It never has anything I need.
</p>

<p>
I think that's a metaphor for the Obama Administration.
</p>

<p>
Moochelle's demonization of snack foods claimed another victim.
<a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hostess-bankruptcy-20120112,0,2872230.story">
Hostess filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy</a>. The legendary maker of Twinkies,
HoHos, and DingDongs is a casualty of the anti-obesity zealots.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
"Twinkies is a well-known brand, but did you ever hear somebody talk about 
Twinkies in a positive light?" asked Ted Gavin, head of the bankruptcy practice 
at NHB Advisors, a turnaround consulting firm in Philadelphia.
</p>

<p>
Hostess makes Wonder Bread too. Another staple of our childhood, about to be
sacrificed, and for what? 550 people will probably lose their jobs, because
regardless of what the First Lady might tell you, kids don't want to eat
carrot sticks and multi-grain cardboard masquerading as "bread."
</p>

<p>
<a href="http://wyblog/us/images/chloe_vevrier_super.jpg" target="_blank">
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/rule5/chloe_vevrier_super-t.jpg" class="iright" /></a>
Speaking of bread, and circuses: Barry and TurboTax Timmy plan to borrow another 
<a href="http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2012/01/obama-pushes-debt-ceiling-hike-to-164.html">
$1.2 trillion dollars</a>, and "invest" it in 
<a href="http://www.theblogmocracy.com/2012/01/13/the-obama-boom-fed-considers-qe3/">
round 3 of Quantitative Easing</a>.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
San Francisco Fed President John Williams said that sustained high levels of 
unemployment, as forecast by many Fed members, "does make an argument that we 
should have more stimulus."
</p>

<p>
The death throes of the Keynesian spendaholics are not going to be pretty.
</p>

<p>
Is there more bad news? You betcha.
</p>

<p>
<a href="http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/2012/01/13/november-trade-deficit-rises-10-4-as-exports-fall/">
November's trade deficit rose to 10.4%</a> as U.S. exports cratered. Again.
</p>

<p class="quoted">
The U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, through the 
Department of Commerce, announced today that total November exports of $177.8 
billion and imports of $225.6 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit 
of $47.8 billion, up from $43.3 billion in October, revised. November exports 
were $1.5 billion less than October exports of $179.4 billion. November imports 
were $2.9 billion more than October imports of $222.6 billion.
</p>

<p>
China makes, America takes.
</p>

<p>
I think it's time to say "screw it all" and hit the beach. Because Chloe is
definitely an argument for "more stimulus."
</p>

<p class="indent">
<img src="http://wyblog.us/images/rule5/chloe_vevrier-beach1.jpg">
</p>

<p>
<br clear="all" />
-----------<br />
Previously:<br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk22.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Short Term Gain For Long Term Pain edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk21.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Year End Wrapup Unhappy New Year Edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk19.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Debbie Wasserman Schultz Reality Check edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk18.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report: the Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk17.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, the Incredibly Shrinking Labor Force edition</a><br />
<a href="http://wyblog.us/blog/economy/obama-jobs-report-wk16.html">My Weekly Obama Jobs Report, Our Dickensian Future Edition</a>

        <span class="blosxomTags"><br />Technorati Tags:
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Obama" rel="tag">Obama</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/jobs" rel="tag">jobs</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/unemployment" rel="tag">unemployment</a>
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Euro" rel="tag">Euro</a>
</span>
]]>
      </description>
      <category>/economy</category>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">obama-jobs-report-wk23</guid>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>

